5/29/2023 0 Comments Adobe zii credability![]() ![]() Somebody i know, makes nice Portraits, with -just- and "dinosaur" Nikon D80, and even her Nikon F75 Film SLR. Personally, i do think the EOS R6 is quite too expensive, for what it is, and so all the new, shiny created RF Mount Lenses received an "Upgrade" Price-wise, more expensive, than the trusted, well proven EF Mount before. Wheter its being Canikon, Sony, whatever. But, are you talking about a non-PD port on a PD bank, or something? I believe I tested both ports on my Anker USB-PD power bank, and in my reading of the R6 manual, it appears to not work unless you use Canon's own cables.Įvery Camera into the last 5+ Years does have fast enough AF, good enough or great DR and Sensor-wise, it's no more a thing like some 10-15 Years ago, pick your Poison, whatever suits you best.īodies are being replaced usally all 3-5+ Years, there are not the System - the System are the Lenses, in which one does invest. I need to dig through the entire menu and maybe even the user manual to confirm this, but at present with the way the R6 I'm testing is configured by default, unfortunately, it leaves the EVF on 100% of the time when you've selected it manually.Īrbitrage, that is simply not my experience. ![]() Although on Nikon, I can't just wave my hand in front of the EVF to activate the rear LCD like I can with the Sony, but for my tripodded time-lapses, it's usually possible to hit the EVF button on Nikons without bumping the time-lapse. I did notice that in my recent testing, and it's a nice feature to also have a dedicated EVF button on the Nikons, compared to Sony which requires you to consume a button (usually C3) since it's in that area) for EVF/LCD switching. Plus, once again, you can use the dual-port charging ability to keep the cameras powered while also using an external timer. This, combined with the great Sony Z-class battery life, allows incredible 4+ hour time-lapses, with a bit of charge still left over in the morning. Sony's overall functionality for time-lapse still wins, though, if you start using external interval timers, because you can operate the camera with neither the EVF nor the LCD on the whole time, since when set to EVF it is not active if your eye is not to the viewfinder. Nikon's built-in time-lapse functions are much more versatile, better than Sony in some ways, and I like how when you turn on auto-ISO and set the exposure ramping to smooth, you get tiny ISO increments much smaller than 1/3 EVs, in fact there is virtually zero exposure smoothing necessary when doing a day-to-night transition, as long as you dial in adequate EV compensation beforehand to account for the poor metering in pitch-dark conditions. At best I can get 3-4 hours of time-lapse out of even the R6 I imagine less out of the R5. however Canon once again fails because the LCD must be on 100% of the time, and if the camera sleeps in between shots, it resets focus when waking up to take the next shot a total deal-breaker for nightscape time-lapses. When it comes to time-lapse, Canon is nice in that it allows an "infinite" option, and intervals in minutes or even hours, (Sony only offers up to 60 sec). Epic fail, considering Sony is on their 2nd and 3rd generations of direct USB power. With any average Anker etc battery pack, as long as it's USB-PD.Ĭanon, on the other hand, is still not fully compatible with options for powering the camera while it is on AFAIK you can only do so using their proprietary USB brick. The new Nikons, including the Z5 even, all accept direct USB-PD power that allows you to operate the camera all day (or in my case, all night) without interruption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |